The Developer Guide to Building LLM-Powered Tools
Jun 25, 2026
The Core Pattern
LLM-powered tools follow a loop:
User input → Build context → Call LLM → Parse response → Execute action → Repeat Context Is Everything
The difference between a useless tool and a brilliant one is context quality. Include:
- Relevant files — not the whole codebase, just what the task touches
- Conventions — coding style, naming, patterns from the project
- Constraints — “Never use
any”, “Use CSS over JS for layout” - Previous turns — what was tried, what failed, what the user corrected
Tools like OpenCode use skills to inject conventions. Skills are project-specific context that persists across sessions.
Tool Calling
LLMs need tools to affect the world. Design tools as composable primitives:
search_files(pattern) → file locations
read_file(path) → file content
edit_file(path, old, new) → diff
run_command(cmd) → output Each tool should have clear inputs, documented outputs, and error handling. The LLM can’t debug your tool — make errors descriptive.
Avoiding Pitfalls
- Token budgets — LLMs have finite context. Trim irrelevant history.
- Determinism — LLMs are non-deterministic. Always verify outputs.
- Latency — Tool calls add round-trips. Batch when possible.
- Security — Never expose tools that can execute arbitrary commands without guardrails.
The Future
Tools will get richer — read/write databases, deploy services, manage infrastructure. The pattern is the same: context, call, execute, verify. The scope just grows.